Journal of Nuclear Energy Science & Power Generation TechnologyISSN: 2325-9809

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article, J Nucl Ene Sci Power Generat Technol Vol: 10 Issue: 5

The Study of Dimensional Flow of Particles and Calculation of Drag Coefficients under Different Viscosity Fluids

Rasmeet Singh*

Department of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Dr. S.S. Bhatnagar University Institute of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India

*Corresponding Author:
Rasmeet Singh
Department of Chemical Engineering Technology,
Dr. S.S. Bhatnagar niversity Institute of Chemical Engineering Technology,
Panab niversity,
Chandigarh 160014,
India,
Tel: 9988900108;
Email: srasmeet9@gmail.com

Received date: August, 24, 2021; Accepted date: November 18, 2021; Published date: November 29, 2021

Citation: Singh R, (2021) The Study of Dimensional Flow of Particles and Calculation of Drag Coefficients under Different Viscosity Fluids. J Nucl Ene Sci Power Generat Technol 10: 11.

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted to find the drag coefficient of small spheres of diameter 5.0, 3.45, 5.7, 5.45, and 5.20 mm under ethylene glycol, castor oil, and glycerol. Six liquids with different viscosities and densities are used so as to explore a large range of Reynolds numbers. The tubes are divided into different zones of known length. Different spherical balls of various materials and diameters are taken to observe the drag coefficient. The materials of the spherical balls are made up of glass and steel. The setup also included a stopwatch to determine the time duration of various distance intervals, a measuring scale to measure the distance of the intervals on the cylindrical tubes, a screw gauge to note down the diameters of the various spherical balls, a thermometer to note down the temperature.

Keywords: Drag coefficient, Reynolds number, Fluid flow, Stokes law.

Introduction

While processing fluids via pipes and channels, a friction force shows to be a useful quantity. An analogous factor known as drag coefficient is utilized for immersed solids [1, 2]. It is defined as CD = (FD/ AP)/ ρuo2/2g [3].

Where,
FD is the total drag
uo is the free stream velocity
Ap is the projected area of the particle
Dp is the diameter of the particle
For a sphere, Ap = (π/4) Dp2

For particles other than spherical, it is necessary to specify size and geometric form of the object and its orientation with respect to the direction of the flow of the fluid.

For a cylinder so oriented that its axis is perpendicular to the flow, Ap is LDp.

For a cylinder with its axis parallel to the direction of the flow, Ap is (π/4) Dp2.

From dimensional analysis, the drag coefficient of a smooth solid in an incompressible fluid depends upon a Reynolds number and necessary shape ratios. For a given shape,

Equation

The movement of a particle through a fluid requires external force acting on the particle.

Three forces act on a particle moving through a fluid:

• The external force
• The buoyant force, which acts parallel with the external force but in opposite direction
• The drag force, which appears whenever there is relative motion between the particle and the fluid and it acts to oppose the motion and acts in direction opposite to that of the fluid.

Consider a particle of mass m moving through a fluid under the action of an external force Fe

U: velocity of the particle relative to the fluid
Fb: Buoyant force on the particle
FD: drag force

Then the resultant force on the particle is:

Equation

Therefore,

Equation

The external force can be expressed as a product of the mass and the acceleration ae of the particle from this force

Equation

The drag force is given by

Equation

The buoyant force is, by Archimedes’ principle, the product of the mass of the fluid displaced by the particle and the acceleration from the external force and is given by

Equation

Substituting equations 4, 5, 6 in equation 3

Equation

At terminal velocity put Equation and we get

Equation

If the particles are spheres of diameter Dp

Equation

Using the above two equations in equation (7)

Equation

Stokes’ law:

At low Reynolds numbers, the drag coefficient varies inversely with Rep and the equations for CD, FD and ut are [3, 4]:

The above equation is a form of Stokes’ law, which applies when the particle Reynolds number is less than 1.

Equation

The above equation is a form of Stokes’ law, which applies when the particle Reynolds number is less than 1.

Newton’s law:

For 1000<Rep<200000, the drag coefficient is approximately constant, and the equations are

Equation

The above equation is Newton’s law and applies only for fairly large particles falling in gases or low viscous fluids.

From the equation given by Turton and Levenspiel:

Equation

This equation defines the complete solid drag curve for < 2*

Experimental Procedure

The temperature was noted down using a thermometer.

The viscosities and densities of six different liquids taken in cylindrical tubes were noted.

5 spherical balls of different sizes and material were taken and their diameter using screw gauge was noted.

Cylindrical tube was divided into different zones of known length having a static liquid.

A spherical ball of known diameter was dropped into the cylindrical tube, taking care that it does not touch the boundaries by dropping it almost from the middle of the tube.

The time of fall of each ball in each interval was noted carefully with the help of the bulb.

For each ball the reading was taken at least three times to reduce the error.

The same procedure was repeated for the remaining tubes.

Recordings

Density of Glass = 2600 kg/m3
Density of Steel = 7800 kg/m3

Fluid Density (kg/m3) Viscosity
(kg/m s)
PIPE 1 900 0.2
PIPE 2 911 0.084

Table 1: Properties of fluids.

Ball Name Diameter (mm)
Big steel ball S1 5
Medium steel ball S2 3.45
Large Glass ball G1 5.7
Medium glass ball G2 5.45
Small glass ball G3 5.2

Table 2: Specifications of balls used.

Observations

Ball t1 (sec) t2 (sec) t3 (sec)
s1 = 0.297m s2 = 0.316m s3 = 0.279m
Small Glass Ball 0.88 1.14 1
0.95 1.13 1.08
1.14 1.17 1.2
Medium Steel Ball 0.12 0.37 0.61
0.18 0.2 0.44
0.18 0.45 0.28
0.22 0.54 0.36
Small Steel Ball 0.4 0.41 0.16
0.29 0.39 0.22
0.2 0.41 0.38
0.26 0.47 0.28
Large Glass Ball 0.86 1.1 0.72
0.89 1.14 0.85
0.73 0.84 0.88
0.91 0.69 0.63

Table 3: Observation table for ethylene glycol.

Ball t1 t2 t3
s1 = 0.297m s2= 0.316m s3= 0.279m
Small Glass Ball 20.21 25.49 22.92
21.59 24.21 22.64
14.92 15.34 25.11
Medium Steel Ball 4.3 4.52 4.93
4.46 4.99 6.36
4.18 4.55 4.65
4.2 4.32 4.59
Small Steel Ball 6.55 6.58 6.8
6.43 6.63 6.07
6.44 7.06 11.38
6.43 6.7 7.26
Large Glass Ball 17.58 17.81 19.1
17.36 18.8 20.8
14.7 15.09 15.83
20.71 22.54 23.68

Table 4: Observation table for castor oil.

Ball t1 t2 t3
s1 = 0.297m s2= 0.316m s3= 0.279m
Small Glass Ball 7.23 6.69 7.49
6.78 7.23 8.45
6.82 7.29 8.72
Medium Steel Ball 1.38 1.58 1.48
1.41 1.45 1.69
1.54 1.32 1.85
Small Steel Ball 1.98 2.07 2.49
1.79 2.08 2.48
1.83 2.16 2.46
4.22 5.03 5.47
Large Glass Ball 3.99 4.34 4.93
4.95 5.22 5.97

Table 5: Observation table for glycerol.

Calculations

Ball t1 t2 t3 v1 v2 v3 v average Exp. Terminal Velocity Re Theo. Terminal Velocity CD, experimental CD, theoretical
  s1 = 0.297m s2 = 0.316m s3 = 0.279m
Small Glass Ball 0.88 1.14 1 0.3375 0.277193 0.279 0.297898 0.278602 6.740951 0.06166 3.5603286 5.7183054
0.95 1.13 1.08 0.3126316 0.279646 0.258333 0.283537
1.14 1.17 1.2 0.2605263 0.270085 0.2325 0.254371
Medium Steel Ball 0.12 0.37 0.61 2.475 0.854054 0.457377 1.262144 1.142446 31.90704 0.36946 0.7521851 2.0192587
0.18 0.2 0.44 1.65 1.58 0.634091 1.28803
0.18 0.45 0.28 1.65 0.702222 0.996429 1.116217
0.22 0.54 0.36 1.35 0.585185 0.775 0.903395
Small Steel Ball 0.4 0.41 0.16 0.7425 0.770732 1.74375 1.085661 1.013381 22.41776 0.23179 1.0705798 2.5002378
0.29 0.39 0.22 1.0241379 0.810256 1.268182 1.034192
0.2 0.41 0.38 1.485 0.770732 0.734211 0.996647
0.26 0.47 0.28 1.1423077 0.67234 0.996429 0.937026
Large Glass Ball 0.86 1.1 0.72 0.3453488 0.287273 0.3875 0.340041 0.357212 10.66791 0.09394 2.2497388 4.0935011
0.89 1.14 0.85 0.3337079 0.277193 0.328235 0.313045
0.73 0.84 0.88 0.4068493 0.37619 0.317045 0.366695
0.91 0.69 0.63 0.3263736 0.457971 0.442857 0.409067

Table 6: Calculations for ethylene glycol.

Ball t1 t2 t3 v1 v2 v3 v average Exp. U Re Theo. U CD, experimental CD, theoretical
  s1 = 0.297m s2= 0.316m s3= 0.279m
Small Glass Ball 20.21 25.49 22.92 0.0146957 0.012397 0.012173 0.013088 0.0144461 0.083775 0.018866 286.48244 296.20162
21.59 24.21 22.64 0.0137564 0.013052 0.012323 0.013044
14.92 15.34 25.11 0.0199062 0.0206 0.011111 0.017206
Medium Steel Ball 4.3 4.52 4.93 0.0690698 0.069912 0.056592 0.065191 0.0645425 0.374291 0.104888 64.121256 69.937562
4.46 4.99 6.36 0.0665919 0.063327 0.043868 0.057929
4.18 4.55 4.65 0.0710526 0.069451 0.06 0.066834
4.2 4.32 4.59 0.0707143 0.073148 0.060784 0.068216
Small Steel Ball 6.55 6.58 6.8 0.0453435 0.048024 0.041029 0.044799 0.0434492 0.251968 0.065805 95.250217 101.91209
6.43 6.63 6.07 0.0461897 0.047662 0.045964 0.046605
6.44 7.06 11.38 0.046118 0.044759 0.024517 0.038465
6.43 6.7 7.26 0.0461897 0.047164 0.03843 0.043928
Large Glass Ball 17.58 17.81 19.1 0.0168942 0.017743 0.014607 0.016415 0.0162906 0.094471 0.028742 254.04528 263.37201
17.36 18.8 20.8 0.0171083 0.016809 0.013413 0.015777
14.7 15.09 15.83 0.0202041 0.020941 0.017625 0.01959
20.71 22.54 23.68 0.0143409 0.01402 0.011782 0.013381

Table 7: Calculations for castor oil.

Calculations for glycerol.

Ball t1 t2 t3 v1 v2 v3 v average Exp. U Re Theo. U CD, experimental CD, theoretical
s1 = 0.297m s2= 0.316m s3= 0.279m
Small Glass Ball 7.23 6.69 7.49 0.041079 0.047235 0.03725 0.041854 0.040554 0.126759 0.006331 189.33532 197.76742
6.78 7.23 8.45 0.043805 0.043707 0.033018 0.040177
6.82 7.29 8.72 0.043548 0.043347 0.031995 0.03963
Medium Steel Ball 1.38 1.58 1.48 0.215217 0.2 0.188514 0.201244 0.197828 0.618352 0.041194 38.812831 43.709094
1.41 1.45 1.69 0.210638 0.217931 0.165089 0.197886
1.54 1.32 1.85 0.192857 0.239394 0.150811 0.194354
Small Steel Ball 1.98 2.07 2.49 0.15 0.152657 0.112048 0.138235 0.140784 0.44005 0.041194 54.53929 60.041499
1.79 2.08 2.48 0.165922 0.151923 0.1125 0.143448
1.83 2.16 2.46 0.162295 0.146296 0.113415 0.140669
4.22 5.03 5.47 0.070379 0.062823 0.051005 0.061403 0.061702 0.192862 0.009645 124.4412 131.7428
Large Glass Ball 3.99 4.34 4.93 0.074436 0.072811 0.056592 0.067946
4.95 5.22 5.97 0.06 0.060536 0.046734 0.055757

Results

Figure 1: Plot of CD experimental versus CD theoretical.

Figure 2: Plot of CD experimental versus Reynolds number.

Figure 3: Plot of U theoretical versus U experimental.

Figure 4: Plot of CD experimental versus CD theoretical.

Figure 5: Plot of CD experimental versus Reynolds number.

Figure 6: Plot of U theoretical versus U experimental.

Figure 7: Plot of CD experimental versus CD theoretical.

Figure 8: Plot of CD experimental versus Reynolds number.

Figure 9: Plot of U theoretical versus U experimental.

Discussion of Result

From the experiment we studied the nature of different fluids of different densities and viscosities. We saw the variation in drag coefficient by varying the Reynolds No. i.e. we used spherical balls of various materials as well as diameters. We saw there were quite discrepancies in the experimental and the theoretical plot of velocity and coefficient of drag vs Reynolds no. The discrepancies may be due to parallax, error in noting the time, wall effects, instrumental error due to screw gauge in measuring the diameter and human error might also have crept in due a large no. of people working at the same time.

References

international publisher, scitechnol, subscription journals, subscription, international, publisher, science

Track Your Manuscript

Awards Nomination

Media Partners