Spanish 
Chinese 
Russian 
German 
French 
Japanese 
Portuguese 
Hindi Commentary, J Regen Med Vol: 5 Issue: 1
Stem Cells and Management of Healthcare Costs: Stem Cell-Based Treatments and the Societal Balance Sheet
| Michelle Wedemeyer1,3, Samuel Bederman S2 and Oswald Steward1* | |
| 1Reeve-Irvine Spinal Cord Injury Center, University of California, Irvine, USA | |
| 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, USA | |
| 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, USA | |
| Corresponding author : Oswald Steward Reeve-Irvine Research Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Tel: 949-824-8908 Fax: 949-824-2625 E-mail: osteward@uci.edu |
|
| Received: August 22, 2015 Accepted: February 03, 2016 Published: February 10, 2016 | |
| Citation: Wedemeyer M, Samuel Bederman S, Steward O (2016) Stem Cells and Management of Healthcare Costs: Stem Cell-Based Treatments and the Societal Balance Sheet. J Regen Med 5:1. doi:10.4172/2325-9620.1000125 |
Abstract
Stem Cells and Management of Healthcare Costs: Stem Cell-Based Treatments and the Societal Balance Sheet
Proposed stem cell based therapies have the potential to be highly costly. In an era of shrinking research budgets and ballooning healthcare costs, this article discusses the feasibility of stem cell based therapies for the following conditions in light of the concept of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): 1) hematologic malignancy, 2) osteoarthritis, 3) type I diabetes, 4) amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and 5) spinal cord injury. These case studies illustrate the following major contributors to the potential cost effectiveness of a stem cell based therapy: 1) presence of existing treatments, 2) method of transplantation, 3) potential for improvements in quality and quantity of life, 4) need for immunosuppression, and 5) single administration versus repeat treatments. We propose that strategic investment in large sum translational grants should be for projects that have the potential for both efficacy AND feasibility – that is the potential for inclusion into standard medical practice and coverage by insurance carriers.
