Short Communication, Biomater Med Appl Vol: 7 Issue: 1

Orthopedic Biomaterials: An Effective Solution for Musculoskeletal Disorders

Navvaro cartel^*

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

*Corresponding Author: Navvaro cartel
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Iasi, Romania
E-mail: navvaro23@gmail.com

Received date: 27 February, 2023, Manuscript No. BMA-23-93088;
Editor assigned date: 01 March, 2023, Pre QC No. BMA-23-93088(PQ);
Reviewed date: 17 March, 2023, QC No. BMA-23-93088;
Revised date: 27 March, 2023, Manuscript No: BMA-23-93088(R);
Published date: 04 April, 2023, DOI: 10.35248/ 2577-0268.100509

Citation: Cartel N (2023) Orthopedic Biomaterials: An Effective Solution for Musculoskeletal Disorders. Biomater Med Appl 12:1.

Description

Orthopedic biomaterials have been extensively studied and developed in recent years due to their potential in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. These materials can be engineered to mimic the properties of natural tissues and provide mechanical support, promote tissue regeneration, and enhance biocompatibility. The use of biomaterials in orthopedics has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders and improve patient outcomes. Orthopedic biomaterials are synthetic or natural materials that are used to replace or repair damaged tissues or organs in the musculoskeletal system [1]. These materials have been extensively studied and developed due to their ability to promote tissue regeneration, provide mechanical support, and enhance biocompatibility. The use of orthopedic biomaterials has significantly improved the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders and has provided new options for patients who suffer from chronic pain or disability [2]. There are several types of orthopedic biomaterials, including metals, ceramics, polymers, and composites. Each material has its own unique properties that make it suitable for specific applications. Metals, such as titanium and stainless steel, are commonly used in orthopedic implants due to their strength and biocompatibility. Ceramics, such as alumina and zirconia, are also used in orthopedic implants due to their high strength and wear resistance[3]. Polymers, such as polyethylene and polyurethane, are used in joint replacements due to their flexibility and biocompatibility. Composites, which are made up of a combination of two or more materials, are used to provide a balance of strength, flexibility, and biocompatibility.

The properties of orthopedic biomaterials are critical in determining their suitability for specific applications. Some of the key properties of orthopedic biomaterials include mechanical strength, wear resistance, corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Mechanical strength is essential in orthopedic implants to provide support for the weight-bearing bones and joints. Wear resistance is critical in joint replacements to ensure that the implant does not wear down over time. Corrosion resistance is important in metallic implants to prevent the release of metal ions into the surrounding tissues[4-6]. Biocompatibility is essential to ensure that the implant does not cause an adverse reaction in the patient's body. Biodegradability is important in materials that are intended to be absorbed by the body over time [7-9]. Orthopedic biomaterials have a wide range of applications in orthopedic surgery. They are used in joint replacements, fracture fixation, spinal implants, and dental implants. Joint replacements, such as hip and knee replacements, are the most common application of orthopedic biomaterials. These implants are typically made of metals, ceramics, or polymers and are designed to mimic the natural anatomy and function of the joint. Fracture fixation devices, such as screws and plates, are made of metals and are used to stabilize broken bones during the healing process [10]. Spinal implants, such as intervertebral discs and spinal fusion devices, are made of a combination of metals, ceramics, and polymers and are used to provide stability and support to the spinal column. Dental implants, which are typically made of titanium, are used to replace missing teeth and restore oral function.

Reference

1. Sridharan R, Cameron AR, Kelly DJ, Kearney CJ, O’Brien FJ (2015) Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: A review and suggested design principles. Mater Today 18: 313–25.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

2. Fukazawa T, Naora Y, Kunieda T, Kubo T (2009) Suppression of the immune response potentiates tadpole tail regeneration during the refractory period. Development 136:2323–7.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

3. Mescher AL, Neff AW, King MW (2013) Changes in the inflammatory response to injury and its resolution during the loss of regenerative capacity in developing Xenopus limbs. PLoS One 8:e80477.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

4. Arnold L, Henry A, Poron F, Baba-Amer Y, Van Rooijen N, et al (2007) Inflammatory monocytes recruited after skeletal muscle injury switch into antiinflammatory macrophages to support myogenesis. J Exp Med 204:1057–69.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

5. Brown BN, Ratner BD, Goodman SB, Amar S, Badylak SF (2012) Macrophage polarization: An opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 33:3792–802.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

6. Gardner AB, Lee SK, Woods EC, Acharya AP (2013) Biomaterials-based modulation of the immune system. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–7.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

7. Féréol S, Fodil R, Labat B, Galiacy S, Laurent VM, et al (2006) Sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties. Cytoskeleton 63:321–40.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

8. Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, et al (2004) The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:677–86.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

9. Williams DF (2009) On the nature of biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5897–909.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]