Journal of Regenerative MedicineISSN: 2325-9620

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Opinion Article, Jrgm Vol: 13 Issue: 3

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Revolutionizing Regenerative Medicine and Disease Modeling

Gustavo Campo*

Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada

*Corresponding Author: Gustavo Campo
Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
E-mail: gustavocampo@unibe.ch

Received: 01-May-2024, Manuscript No. JRGM-24-134994,
Editor assigned: 03-May-2024, PreQC No. JRGM-24-134994 (PQ),
Reviewed: 17-May-2024, QC No. JRGM-24-134994,
Revised: 21-May-2024, Manuscript No. JRGM-24-134994 (R),
Published: 28-May-2024, DOI:10.4172/2325-9620.1000308

Citation: Campo G (2024) Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Revolutionizing Regenerative Medicine and Disease Modeling. J Regen Med 13:3.

Copyright: © 2024 Campo G. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) represent a groundbreaking advancement in the field of regenerative medicine and biomedical research. Discovered by Shinya Yamanaka and Kazutoshi Takahashi in 2006, iPSCs are generated by reprogramming adult somatic cells to an embryonic stem cell-like state. This discovery has opened up new avenues for personalized medicine, disease modeling, and drug discovery, revolutionizing our approach to understanding and treating various diseases. This article delves into the generation, applications, and future prospects of iPSCs, highlighting their transformative impact on science and medicine [1, 2].

Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells

The process of generating iPSCs involves the introduction of specific transcription factors into adult somatic cells, such as fibroblasts. The original reprogramming cocktail used by Yamanaka included four key factors: Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc, collectively known as the Yamanaka factors. These factors work synergistically to revert differentiated cells back to a pluripotent state, meaning they can differentiate into any cell type in the body [3].

The Yamanaka factors are critical for reprogramming as they activate genes associated with pluripotency and suppress genes related to differentiation. While the original method utilized viral vectors to deliver these factors, which posed risks of genetic mutations and cancer, subsequent advancements have led to non-integrative methods such as episomal plasmids, RNA transfection, and small molecules to enhance safety and efficiency [4].

Various cell types can be used for reprogramming, including skin fibroblasts, blood cells, and even urine-derived cells. The choice of cell type can influence the efficiency of reprogramming and the characteristics of the resulting iPSCs. Once generated, iPSCs are characterized to confirm their pluripotency. This involves assessing their ability to differentiate into the three germ layers (endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm), checking for the expression of pluripotency markers, and performing teratoma formation assays in animal models.

Applications of induced pluripotent stem cells

The versatility of iPSCs has led to their widespread use in various fields, including regenerative medicine, disease modeling, and drug discovery. iPSCs hold immense potential for regenerative therapies due to their ability to generate patient-specific cells, minimizing the risk of immune rejection.  Cell replacement therapy iPSCs can be differentiated into specific cell types, such as cardiomyocytes, neurons, or pancreatic beta cells, which can be used to replace damaged or diseased tissues. For example, iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons are being explored as a treatment for Parkinson's disease. Tissue engineering iPSCs can be used to create tissue constructs for transplantation. For instance, iPSC-derived cardiac patches are being developed to repair damaged heart tissue after a myocardial infarction. Advances in bioengineering and iPSC technology have enabled the development of mini-organs or organoids, such as liver buds and kidney organoids, which can be used for transplantation or as models for studying organ development and disease [5, 6].

Disease modeling

iPSCs provide a powerful tool for creating in vitro models of human diseases, allowing researchers to study disease mechanisms and identify potential therapeutic targets. Genetic diseases iPSCs derived from patients with genetic disorders, such as cystic fibrosis or Huntington's disease, can be differentiated into relevant cell types to study disease pathology and test potential treatments. Neurodegenerative diseases iPSC-derived neurons from patients with Alzheimer's disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) can be used to investigate the underlying causes of neurodegeneration and screen for neuroprotective drugs. Cardiovascular diseases iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from patients with inherited cardiac conditions, such as long QT syndrome or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, can be used to study disease mechanisms and test drug efficacy and safety.

iPSCs enable the development of personalized treatments tailored to an individual's genetic makeup.

By generating iPSCs from a patient's own cells, researchers can create personalized disease models and test potential treatments to determine the most effective therapy with the least side effects. iPSCs can be used to study how genetic variations affect drug responses, paving the way for more precise and personalized medical treatments [7, 8].

Challenges and future directions

Improving the efficiency and safety of reprogramming methods is crucial for the clinical application of iPSCs. Non-integrative methods that avoid genetic modifications are being developed, but these techniques need further optimization to increase reprogramming efficiency and reduce the risk of mutations. Standardizing protocols for the generation, differentiation, and characterization of iPSCs is essential for reproducibility and scalability. Developing robust and scalable methods for producing large quantities of high-quality iPSCs and their derivatives is critical for clinical and industrial applications.

The use of iPSCs raises ethical and regulatory issues, particularly concerning the source of somatic cells and the potential for creating germline modifications. Establishing ethical guidelines and regulatory frameworks is necessary to ensure the responsible use of iPSCs in research and therapy. Although iPSCs can be derived from a patient's own cells, potential issues with immune rejection still exist due to genetic and epigenetic differences. Developing strategies to ensure immunocompatibility is a key area of research.

Future research aims to enhance the applications of iPSCs in more complex tissue and organ regeneration. This includes the development of vascularized organoids, integration with advanced biomaterials, and improving methods for directing precise cell differentiation and tissue organization [9, 10].

Conclusion

Induced pluripotent stem cells have revolutionized the field of regenerative medicine, offering unprecedented opportunities for personalized therapy, disease modeling, and drug discovery. As research advances, the challenges associated with iPSCs are being addressed, bringing us closer to realizing their full potential. The ability to generate patient-specific pluripotent cells holds promise for transforming medical treatments, providing hope for curing previously untreatable diseases, and advancing our understanding of human biology. The future of iPSCs is bright, and their continued development will undoubtedly lead to significant breakthroughs in science and medicine.

References

  1. Benedict MA, Mofolo N, Adefuye AO (2020) The Economic Burden Of Deliberate Self-Poisoning: Insight From A Tertiary Hospital In The Free State Province, South Africa. Pan Afr Med J; 36(1).
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Conti A, Sacchetto D, Putoto G (2022) Implementation of the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in a New Ambulance System in Beira, Mozambique: A Retrospective Observational Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 19(16):10298.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Christie CA, Barela E (2005) The Delphi Technique As A Method For Increasing Inclusion In The Evaluation Process. CJPE; 20(1):105-122.
  6. Google Scholar                                           

  7. Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C (2011) Using And Reporting The Delphi Method For Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review. PloS One ;6(6):e20476.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Marteau TM, Wynne G, Kaye W, Evans TR (1990Resuscitation: experience without feedback increases confidence but not skill. BMJ; 300(6728):849.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. Ramu M, Ananthasubramanian M, Kumaresan T, Gandhinathan R, Jothi S. Optimization of the configuration of porous bone scaffolds made of Polyamide/Hydroxyapatite composites using Selective Laser Sintering for tissue engineering applications. Biomed Mater Eng; 29(6):739-755.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Khoda AK, Ozbolat IT, Koc B (2011) A functionally gradient variational porosity architecture for hollowed scaffolds fabrication. Biofabrication; 3(3):034106.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Manzano S, Poveda-Reyes S, Ferrer GG, Ochoa I, Doweidar MH (2014) Computational analysis of cartilage implants based on an interpenetrated polymer network for tissue repairing. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Update; 116(3):249-59.
  16. Google Scholar

  17. Goh GD, Sing SL, Yeong WY (2021) A review on machine learning in 3D printing: applications, potential, and challenges. Artif Intell Rev; 54(1):63-94.
  18. Google Scholar

  19. Castilho M, de Ruijter M, Beirne S, Villette CC, Ito K, et al.(2020) multitechnology Biofabrication: A New Approach For The Manufacturing Of Functional Tissue Structures?. Trends Biotechnol; 38(12):1316-28.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

international publisher, scitechnol, subscription journals, subscription, international, publisher, science

Track Your Manuscript

Awards Nomination